→ USE CASE · MULTI-TENANT SAAS PLATFORMS
One platform. Many clients. Zero leaks.
Building multi-tenant that scales is what separates a viable SaaS platform from one you'll throw away at 18 months. Deciding isolation, auth, billing, and per-tenant configuration upfront costs time. Not deciding costs the entire product.
→ CRITICAL DECISIONS
What separates a viable platform from one you'll throw away.
There are three ways to do multi-tenant: shared schema (fastest, least isolated), schema per tenant (best balance), or database per tenant (max isolation, max operational complexity). The right choice depends on your market, compliance, and volume.
When we built PesPro, we went schema-per-tenant. When we recommend to other clients, it depends. The wrong way to decide is assuming "the priciest tenant defines the architecture." The right way is to understand the cost of being wrong for each model.